Reader, please note: I am in the early stages of compiling research on working class prostitutes in period. I am especially focused on British prostitution, brothels, and “whores” as legally defined in Britain during period. There is much more coming soon! Thank you in advance for your patience.
None madame can be a candidate with you for this dedication, tis your Lordship alone ha’s passed all the forms, and classes in this school, what delights you give, and with what eagerness you perform your fucking exercises is sufficiently know to the many have enjoyed you, for Madam like the Supreame Powers have such a communicative goodness, mas you scorn monopolizing your cut to a single keeper, but have generously refused no man a kindness who desired it, having often been heard to say ’twas not in your nature to deny satisfaction to a standing prick into a cunt, but the well managing of a fuck makes the Summum Bonum (“highest good”). Tell not me therefore of Messalina, what though she was enjoyed by fourty or fifty men in ma day, if your Ladyship could command as many bodies as you have had pintles (“penises”) between your legs, you might lead as great an Army as Xerxes did into Greece, or if a Pyramide of those standing tarses (“penises”) your cunt hath subdued were to be erected, by the Persian sophy in Spahaune, under your patronage there fore this book comes abroad, and if it have your approbation I care not if other Ladies dislike it, Favorably there fore receive this Dedication from, Madame, your most humble servant. (The School of Venus or The Ladies Delight, reduced to rules of practice anno 1680)
Fun Facts about British Sex Work:
- Pimps were known as ‘bawds’. Bawds could be male or female.
- A woman convicted of bawdery could expect to spend some time in the stew, as well as having her head forcibly shaven before a jeering mob.
- For the most part, brothels were forbidden in towns; only in a couple of cases, such as in Southwark, were there regulated brothels. In Southwark – the Bishop of Winchester owned the properties in question, and the ladies were often known as “Winchester Geese“.
- Some of the strictest laws around women’s dress in history involve making prostitutes stand out as different. Depending on where you lived, a prostitute had to wear yellow, black or white, mark herself out with tassels on her arm, or, if she lived in England, wear a distinctive striped hood. Yellow was a common marker for a societal outsider: it was also associated with medieval Jews living in European cities.
- London banned whores from dressing like “good and noble dames or damsels”, and prostitutes could not wear fur-lined hoods, but rather striped hoods, un-lined. Striped hoods became a symbol of prostitution, so that Bristol issued a law that proclaimed “Let no whore walk in the town without a striped hood.”
- To the contrary, in the Encyclopedia Of Prostitution and Sex Work, Debbie Clare Olson points out that prostitutes were pretty much the only people who got to dress “above their station”: actively encouraged to flout sumptuary laws and dress as extravagant noblewomen, complete with jewelry and embroidery everywhere. It marked them as an outsider, rather than part of “normal” regulated society.
- The 1299 Coroner’s Roll for Oxford records the murder of Margery de Hereford. The coroner determined that an unnamed clerk had known Margery carnally, and that when she demanded her fee the clerk stabbed her in the left breast.
- Source: Karras, Common Women
Rome and Roman Britain
“Sex Work is Work” in Medieval Britain
Excerpt from Ruth Karras. Common Women: Prostitution and Sexuality in Medieval England:
Whereas for men prostitution sometimes substituted for marriage as a sexual outlet, for women it substituted for marriage as a means of financial support. It was difficult for a woman to support herself outside the conjugal unit . . . [f]or those who did not marry – whether by choice or by circumstance – options might be limited even under favorable economic conditions (Karras, 49).
Prostitution may have been the only acceptable way for some women to support themselves in the absence of a husband who would provide for them economically. Unfortunately, most prostitutes’ reasons can only be guessed at due to a lack of records in this area. Historians must generally rely on court records that mention women accused of whoredom; very rarely do records detailing the workings of actual brothels still exist. Since the records in question seldom define what they mean by “whoredom” it can be difficult to figure out if the women in question were truly prostitutes (women whose services were generally available to all and sundry in exchange for a fee) or just a bit licentious (akin to Chaucer’s Wife of Bath).
Contributing further to the confusion in England, at least, is that for most women in the trade, prostitution was not their sole occupation. When a woman’s normal occupation didn’t bring in enough money, she might turn to prostitution in order to make up the difference. Therefore, prostitution may have even been, for many women, a cyclical income source undertaken during whatever was the “off” season for their regular occupations (Karras, 54).
Excerpt from a Blog Post on Medieval Brothels : Content Warning- SWERF* Author
In the early Middle Ages, after the breakdown of Roman urban civilization, there is very little sign of prostitution, probably because the culture was so overwhelmingly rural. However, when medieval cities began to grow in the eleventh century, prostitution grew with them….The organized church of course frowned on it, but many a city council, deciding it was better to regulate the practice than to drive it underground, established municipal brothels. In late medieval cities, young women (generally from the countryside) who found no other way to support themselves might go into a brothel. …Often municipal brothels were connected with the municipal bath houses. People would bathe, and while all warm and naked would start to have other thoughts as well, which could be satisfied right nearby. In modern Britain brothels are still sometimes referred to as “stews,” because of their association with bath houses…. Medieval municipal brothels continued until the sixteenth century, when and the religious ferment of the Reformation finally led to their demise.
Excerpt from this well researched article on prostitution in the middle ages with specific mention of British Stews:
Researching prostitution during the Middle Ages is not an easy ask, particularly in Medieval England. Prostitution was not necessarily a woman’s sole career choice and there are many examples of women who used prostitution to supplement their everyday income. A lack of centralised [sic] law across England provides a consistently different attitude towards prostitutes across the country, an attitude which was already significantly different to that on the continent. As a general rule Europe seemed to be far more lenient and accepting of the occupation as a necessary public utility and, although many countries engaged a policy of restriction, it was aimed against the clientele of the prostitutes and not the prostitutes themselves…. The rest of Europe was largely tolerant of sex workers. The rationale being that allowing brothels to operate accorded the authorities some level of control over the industry, created specific areas where men could go to indulge discreetly, protected innocent women and limited the disruption caused by prostitutes who advertised themselves in the street. The idea of publicly operated brothels never caught on in England, which maintained a negative attitude towards the occupation and punished anyone involved; the women themselves, those who allowed it to operate and the clients. England had more prosecutions for prostitution than any other European country, even more than certain areas of Italy which had outright banned the trade. … While there were a number of full time prostitutes, there were also women who simply used it as a means to bolster their primary source of income during particularly hard times, more disturbingly there were those women who were sold by their family members in order to generate funds for the family. … While in London the area of Stewside was unofficially designated the medieval equivalent of the Red Light District, in Coventry any single woman renting a room for herself could be arrested under suspicion of prostitution, which prompted the authorities to outright ban single women from renting rooms. In towns where prostitution was rife but uncontrolled, any woman wandering the streets after dark was presumed to be available for sale and cases of mistaken identity resulting in violence were common.
As such numerous towns/cities demanded that prostitutes dressed themselves in specific clothes to distinguish themselves from the general populace, with most requiring the ladies to don a striped hood. Particularly successful whores found themselves prosecuted for breaching sumptuary laws (laws which restricted the clothing – colour, material etc, that certain classes could wear) rather than the act which earned them the money for the finery in the first place.
Speaking of dress, Francois Piponnier and Perrine Mane state in Dress in the Middle Ages: The striped cloak .. in Marseilles.. the striped hood worn in England, the white hood of Talouse, the black and white pointed hat of Strasbourg were increasingly replaced by bands of fabric stitched to the sleeve or the shoulder, then by tassels worn on the arm.
Prostitution and the Church in Britain
During the later medieval period the Christian notion of the ‘reformed prostitute’ took hold, fueled by the cults of Saint Mary of Egypt and Mary Magdalene, and public opinion softened towards whores. Instead of being women to be reviled, these women were now the subject of charity, and public funds were set up to assist women trying to escape a life of sex work. Despite this in many areas women known to sell their bodies were not allowed membership of their local church until they had set aside their life of sin, though we should also point out that there are numerous, numerous records of churchmen being caught with prostitutes. The punishment for which was severe (for the churchmen). (An excerpt from this well researched article on prostitution in the middle ages.)
Prostitution and the Law in Britain
Trans. Henry Thomas Riley, Liber Albus: The White Book of the City of London, (John Russel Smith 1862)
Trans. & ed. P.J.P Goldberg, Women in England 1275-1525, (Manchester University Press, 1995)
P.J.P. Goldberg, Women, Work and Life Cycle in a Medieval Economy, (Clarendon Press, 1992)
Henrietta Leyser, Medieval Women: A Social History of Women in England 450-1500, (Pheonix, 2002)
James A. Brundage, Law, Sex and Christian Society in Medieval Europe, (University of Chicago Press, 1987)
Edith Ennen, The Medieval Woman, (Basil Blackwell Ltd, 1989)
James A. Brundage, ‘Sex and Canon Law’ in Handbook of Medieval Sexuality ed. Vern L. Bullough and James A. Brundage (Garland Publishing, 1996) pp 33-51
Barbara A. Hanawalt, ‘The Female Felon in Fourteenth Century’ in Women in Medieval Society, ed. Susan Stuard (The University of Pennsylvania Press, 1976) pp 125-141
Ann J. Kettle, ‘Ruined Maids: Prostitutes and Serving Girls in Later Medieval England’ in Matrons and Marginal Women in Medieval Society ed. Robert R. Edwards and Vickie Ziegler (The Boydell Press, 1995) pp 19-33
P.J.P Goldberg, ‘Women’s Work, Women’s Role in the Later Medieval North,’ in Profit, Piety and the Professions in Later Medieval England ed. Michael Hicks (Alan Sutton Publishing, 1990) pp 34-51
Jane Tibbetts Schulenberg, ‘Saints’ Lives as a Source for the History of Women 500-1100’ in Medieval Women and the Sources of Medieval History ed. Joel T. Rosenthal (The University of Georgia Press, 1990) pp 285-321
Ruth Mazo Karras. Common Women: Prostitution and Sexuality in Medieval England, Oxford University PRess, (1998)
Ruth Mazo Karras, ‘Prostitution in Medieval Europe’ in Handbook of Medieval Sexuality ed. Vern L. Bullough and James A. Brundage (Garland Publishing, 1996) pp 243-261
Ruth Mazo Karras. The Regulation of Brothels in Later Medieval England, Signs, Vol. 14, No. 2, Working Together in the Middle Ages: Perspectives on Women’s Communities (Winter, 1989) pp. 399-433
Piponnier, Francoise and Perrine Mane. Dress in the Middle Ages. (Yale University Press, 2000)
Encyclopedia of Prostitution and Sex Work. ed. Melissa Hope Ditmore. (Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006)
“Drunken, Foolish, or Witless Women” : Proper and Improper Dress for Ladies in the 14th Century, a class by Baroness Katheryn Fontayne, OM
Sexual Deviancy and Deviant Sexuality in Medieval England, by Isaac Bershady
Barker, Felix, and Peter Jackson. London, 2000 Years of a City and its People. New York: Macmillan, 1974.
Beattie, Cordelia. “Gender and Femininity in Medieval England.” Writing Medieval History (2005): 153-70.
Clark, Robert and Claire Sponsler. “Queer Play: The Cultural Work of Crossdressing in Medieval Drama.” New Literary History 28, no. 2 (1997): 319-344.
Dinshaw, Carolyn. “Queer Relations.” Essays in Medieval Studies 16 (1999): 79-98.
Elliott, Dyan. “Sexual Scandal and the Clergy; a Medieval Blueprint for Disaster.” Why the Middle Ages Matter; Medieval Light on Modern Injustice (2012): 90-105.
Foucault, Michel. History of Sexuality; An Introduction, Volume 1. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.
Hanawalt, Barbara. “Rituals of Inclusion and Exclusion: Hierarchy and Marginalization in Medieval London.” In Of Good and Ill Repute: Gender and Social Control in Medieval England, ed. by Barbara Hanawalt, 18-34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Hornbeck II, J. Patrick. “Theologies of Sexuality in English ‘Lollardy.’” The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 60, no. 1 (2009): 19-44.
Howell, Martha C. Commerce Before Capitalism in Europe, 1300-1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Karras, Ruth M. and David Lorenzo Boyd. “‘Ut Cum Muliere’; A Male Transvestite Prostitute in Fourteenth-Century London.” Premodern Sexualities (1996): 101-116.
Poos, L. R. “Sex, Lies, and the Church Courts of Pre-Reformation England.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 25, no. 4 (1995): 585-607.
Ruggiero, Guido. “Sodom and Venice.” In The Boundaries of Eros: Sex, Crime, and Sexuality in Renaissance Venice, 109-145. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Scott, Joan. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” The American Historical Review 91, no. 5 (December 1986): 1053-1075.
*SWERF: Sex Work Exclusionary Radical Feminism